Anna
Gorodetskaya
Discuss a project

Portfolio — AI & Automation

AI-native workflows, automated production, custom tools.

AI-native workflows, automated production and custom tools. I decide where the machine takes the repeatable work, where a person decides, and what happens at the point between them.

What I automate

  1. Content production pipeline

    For teams that need regular articles they can trust without an editor rewriting every draft. A writing and verification pipeline with three gates: facts checked against primary sources, then style and language, then format. The editor sees a draft only after all three pass. Runs weekly for an independent bilingual media outlet.

  2. Newsletter production

    For teams that need a weekly newsletter but have no one to spend a day collecting news. Sources are monitored automatically, and the week's items are selected, fact-checked and laid out in the newsletter template, ready for the editor to send. Two issues a week in English and Russian for an independent media outlet, drawn from about 1,900 source items a week.

  3. Publishing integrations

    For teams that lose time moving content between tools. Custom Telegram bots take a link to a document and turn it into a formatted article draft on the site. Approved posts go out on schedule to Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn and YouTube Shorts.

  4. Dashboards and flags

    For teams that want to see where things stand without opening five services. Dashboards built on your own data: traffic, search, newsletter opens, content-plan status. Flags go up when something needs a person, such as a deadline in the next two weeks or an overdue follow-up.

  5. Migrations and bulk changes

    For teams moving to a new platform that can't afford to lose the archive. Content moves with automated checks that nothing was lost. For Arts of the Working Class: 1,100 articles and 3,000 files.

  6. Anything else in marketing

    For teams with a routine that isn't on this list. If a marketing task repeats every week, such as reports, content formats, lists or handovers between tools, it can usually be automated. Tell me what takes up your week, and I'll show you which part a machine can do.

Who this is for

  1. Content, editorial and marketing teams

    The same production runs every week and costs a person a day of it. I build the system that takes the repeatable part.

  2. Independent founders and authors

    There is no team to hand the volume to, so the system has to carry it.

What I can do for you

  1. Redesign how the work gets done

    Map an existing production line and rebuild it: what's automated, where the approval gates sit, and who owns the result.

    Workflow maps · Approval gates · AI agent design · Validation rules

  2. Automate what eats the week

    Take the operation that runs every week — migration, publishing, exports, monitoring — and turn it into something the team runs by itself.

    Automations · Migrations · Publishing bots · Data transformation · Monitoring

  3. Produce content with AI

    Set up AI-assisted content production a real audience will read: research, briefs, drafting, visuals, localisation, publishing and the review between them.

    AI content pipelines · Research workflows · Generated visuals · Localisation · Editorial review

What this covers

  1. Workflow Design

    I map the production line first — where material comes from, who signs it off, what breaks — then decide what's worth automating. Most of the value sits in the approval gates, as at The Difference Machine.

  2. Production Automation

    Removing the repeated operation: migrations, transformations, publishing routines, scheduled distribution, monitoring. Arts of the Working Class moved 1,100 articles and 3,000 files this way.

  3. Custom Tools & Agents

    Small purpose-built tools, not another platform to administer: an assistant a team talks to from where they already work, or a product built as guided conversation, like Clariozo.

  4. Editorial Control

    What makes AI output publishable: verification steps, source discipline, a house voice that survives generation, and a human name on the decision. The Pipeline is run this way.

Every step is either repeatable or a judgment call.

Which steps are repeatable, and which are judgment? The repeatable ones get a pipeline. The judgment ones get a gate with a person's name on it. That is what keeps the output usable.

Doing the same operation by hand every week?

Write to me about your project. I'll come back with a way to do it, or with questions if something's unclear.